How to test LLM prompts before deploying to production

Introduction

‍

Testing prompts for large language models (LLMs) prior to production is critical and requires a rigorous, multidimensional approach combining offline evaluation methods and continuous feedback loops. The goal is to ensure technical performance, ethical alignment, and system security.

‍

1. Prompt engineering: design with precision

‍

Before testing, well-crafted prompt design is essential. Prompt engineering is the art of crafting and refining instructions to effectively guide LLMs. For product managers, it enables prototyping, testing, and iterating on AI use cases without writing any code.

Best practices include:

• Clarity:  Avoid ambiguity, use explicit language, and specify the task and expected output format.
• Context:  Define the situation for the LLM, e.g., assigning a role like “You are a product analyst...”.
• Format specificity:  Guide output structure, e.g., “Return a table...” or “List your answer in numbered points...”.
• Advanced techniques:
• Prompt chaining:  Break complex tasks into smaller linked prompts where each response feeds the next for detailed, structured results.

‍

2. Pre-deployment evaluation methods (offline evaluation)

‍

Offline evaluation is the traditional lab-based method before deployment. It involves running the model on predefined test datasets (“golden datasets”) and calculating performance metrics.

Key steps:

• Define test scenarios:  Build structured test cases based on real prompts or user flows to simulate realistic inputs and uncover edge cases, inconsistencies, or logical failures. Production failures become new test scenarios.
• Apply evaluation criteria:
• Evaluation methods:

‍

3. Feedback loops and continuous iteration

‍

Prompt testing is iterative. Every production failure or edge case should be a concrete opportunity for improvement and a new test scenario.

• Capture and structure failures:  Automate evaluations to flag faulty outputs (accuracy, format, latency, compliance) and immediately add them as new tests.
• Rapid iteration:  Focus fixes on exact failure cases. Replay improved prompts or agent logic against all test scenarios, especially new ones, to ensure fixes solve previous failures without regressions. The goal: turn every “red” (fail) into “green” (pass).
• Continuous performance monitoring:  Define thresholds and receive alerts on output degradation. Real-time monitoring involves detailed logs (inputs, outputs, errors, timestamps) and trace tracking to evaluate full prompt chains step-by-step. This phase blends into post-deployment monitoring but starts with comprehensive pre-launch tests.

Tools like Basalt empower product teams to validate and monitor AI agents clearly and rapidly without advanced technical skills. They provide visual interfaces, side-by-side prompt and agent version comparisons, and structured evaluation reports.

‍

Conclusion

‍

A rigorous, multidimensional approach to prompt testing—combining precise prompt engineering, thorough offline evaluations, and fast, automated feedback loops—is essential to ensure LLM performance, alignment, and security before production deployment. Leveraging modern platforms enables teams to confidently deliver reliable and trustworthy AI-powered features.